1/19/2024 0 Comments For mac instal Text WorkflowTransfer the annotations/highlights to unique notes in Obsidian with references.Read and annotate/highlight the articles downloaded (either by downloading to a unique database all relevant articles, or by running a content search in a larger combined database).Download all reference information in my reference management software (e.g., Endnote Endnote works with Scrivener and Obsidian).Download all content (e.g., pdf, magazine articles) into a topic database in DT3 (e.g., leadership, teams, sensemaking).The feature of ‘compiling’ a document in Scrivener allows you to export the article/dissertation to Word which is what most institutions and publishers ask for. I still use Scrivener for writing research articles using my notes from Obsidian and annotations from DT3. I wrote my dissertation in Scrivener as it worked best for moving sections around and dividing/combining other sections. Everything is referenced in Obsidian with both a direct quotation from the original source, and a summary or paragraph written in my own words.įor writing an article, or when I wrote my dissertation, I use Scrivener. This is my research depository with links to references by using Endnote. Everything, notes and written works in Obsidian. What I have started to do over the past year is to move my notes to Obsidian. Sometimes I have used the function to download annotations to get a summary of my highlights. This makes annotating documents convenient as they are in multiple apps. I also have the same pdf files available through the DTTG app on my I-pad. I use the functionality of DT3 to read and annotate/highlight the pdf so that they are saved in DT3. My typical workflow is to download pdf files and other content into a specific database in DT3. But you can just try out the one(s) you have or search this forum for pointers. I am not sure if there is a comprehensive list of which PDF Viewers/Editors behave well and which don’t. You can use the DT built-in PDF reader (limited but working functionality), but I prefer the DTTG one with an Apple Pencil (also limited, but enough for me).Īnd of course you can use 3rd party PDF editors (but not all of them work well with the DT round-trip sharing function) IIRC PDF Expert is one that does not play nicely. ( Just put a d*** watermark in the file and let me open it in the ebook reader of my choice!) So I try not to use any of their products, even if not is a free PDF reader. %rant% I hate Adobe, mainly for their SW licensing strategy and the ridiculous DRM they put on some of the ebooks I buy (EPUB and PDF) which makes the ebooks almost unusable for me. As others have pointed out in this thread, Apple Notes and Hookmark are not needed. For me and my use cases, Obsidian is a better Reading you original post again, I think that DT and Scrivener might be the combination you are looking for. There is a learning curve with both Scrivener and Obsidian and if you are working on specific big projects such as a thesis or a book, Scrivener certainly has a lot going for it and is certainly worth a look. I make graphs with mermaid, it syncs with Zotero and Readwise. I can use LaTeX when I want to, I use daily notes and templates. Usually, to publish on the web, I just copy a completed markdown file to a different git repo which I then commit and a pipeline using Jekyll and Vercel publishes it automatically. The Pandoc plugin lets me export in a variety of formats if I need to very quickly (I don’t use it that often). There are a butt-load of plugins that let you do anything you can think of, and do it easily. With Obsidian, everything is markdown, I keep my vault is a git repo, so I have very granular versioning and history and use that to sync with the iOS version. It felt like I was dealing with a lot of overhead that wasn’t needed by what I wanted to achieve. Also, Scrivener has a whole lot of functionality that I never needed and I felt intimidated by it. I ended up many times with multiple versions of the same project, not knowing which one was the current one or what the differences were. What made me switch was a few things, such as the whole project-as-a-single-file thing and the inelegant sync situation with the iOS version, which always seemed buggy. It was elegant when it ran correctly, but needed a lot of fiddling to set up and keep running smoothly. And Scrivener might be the right tool for you!Īt the time I had a complex pipeline set up, writing in Markdown with LaTeX and using Scrivomatic ( GitHub - iandol/scrivomatic: A writing workflow using Scrivener's style system + Pandoc for output… ).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |